Question & Answer
What Are Liquidation Preferences, and Why Do They Matter?
Liquidation preferences dictate who gets paid first—and how much—when a company exits through a sale, merger, or dissolution. They are a critical component of investment agreements, ensuring that investors recover their capital before common shareholders receive any proceeds.
How Liquidation Preferences Work
When a company goes through a liquidity event, the payout follows a hierarchy. Investors with preferred stock often negotiate liquidation preferences that guarantee them a return on their investment before the remaining funds are distributed to common shareholders.
Types of Liquidation Preferences
Liquidation preferences come in different structures, each impacting payout distribution:
- 1x Liquidation Preference: The standard structure, where an investor gets back their original investment before any common shareholder distributions.
- 2x or 3x Liquidation Preference: The investor receives two or three times their original investment before other payouts begin.
- Participating Liquidation Preference: After receiving their preference payout, the investor also shares in the remaining distribution as if they were a common shareholder.
- Non-Participating Liquidation Preference: The investor must choose between taking their preference payout or converting to common shares to participate in the remaining distribution.
- Capped Participation: A hybrid approach where the investor participates in the remaining funds but only up to a set multiple (e.g., 3x their initial investment).
Example: The Impact of Liquidation Preferences
Imagine a company raises $5M from investors and later sells for $10M. Without a liquidation preference, common and preferred shareholders split the proceeds based on ownership.
However, if an investor negotiated a 2x liquidation preference on their $2M investment, they receive $4M first. The remaining $6M is then split among other shareholders.
In contrast, with a participating liquidation preference, the investor would receive their $4M plus a share of the remaining $6M, increasing their total return.
Why Liquidation Preferences Matter
For investors, liquidation preferences provide downside protection. If a company exits at a lower-than-expected valuation, investors with strong preference terms can still recoup their investment.
For founders, excessive liquidation preferences can create misaligned incentives. If investors secure high multiples or aggressive participation rights, founders and employees may receive little to nothing in a sale.
How Founders and Investors Should Approach Liquidation Preferences
Investors should negotiate liquidation preferences based on risk exposure. In high-risk investments, a strong preference helps ensure capital recovery.
Founders should balance investor demands with long-term incentives. Agreeing to aggressive liquidation terms in early rounds can make later funding rounds more challenging.
Liquidation preferences are a powerful tool that shape how investors get paid in an exit. They provide security but also impact the potential upside for founders and employees.
In Deal Structuring, I discuss how investors and founders can negotiate fair and strategic liquidation preferences. The right structure ensures that all parties remain aligned and incentivized for long-term success.
Deal Structuring
Buy the book today and dive into practical techniques that empower you to get started immediately, navigating transactions efficiently and maximizing your success in minimizing cash requirements.
In this book, you will:
- Be introduced to the fundamentals of deal structuring
- Learn 19 proven deal models for structuring deals
- Discover 39 key elements of deal nuances
- Access 32 actionable clauses for your term sheets
- Explore 9 specific deal structures
- Receive 257 pages of invaluable insights
- Gain the distilled expertise of 20 years